In canceling Roe vs. Wade, the Supreme Court ruled that women no longer had the constitutional right to abortion. In Dobb’s c. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Court ruled that the issue of abortion was entirely a matter for the political process. What does that mean?
On the face of it, this restores the law to what it was before 1973 when Roe vs. Wade has been decided. Each state will determine for itself whether to protect the right to abortion or whether to ban some or all abortions. More than half of the states are expected to ban all or nearly all abortions.
Prior to 1973, women seeking an abortion who had financial resources went to places where abortion was legal or found a friendly doctor to perform a safe and illegal abortion. Poor women and destitute adolescent girls faced the stark choice between an unwanted child and an unsafe abortion. Women of color have suffered much higher rates of death and illness from illegal abortions.
We are sure to see all of this again. But there are also ways in which the situation is very different from 50 years ago. Abortion has become a political issue in a way it never was before Roe vs. Wade. Conservative politicians who have been denouncing abortion rights for decades are not going to give up on this political issue. There will likely be far more aggressive enforcement of abortion bans than before 1973. Expect to see doctors and women prosecuted for violating state abortion bans far more frequently than before. deer.
Conservative politicians will seek new forms of restrictions, such as a proposed Missouri law that would bar a woman from leaving the state to have an abortion. Some states will pass laws to eliminate forms of birth control that take effect after conception, such as IUDs and the morning after pill. There will be regulation of medical procedures, such as in vitro fertilization, with some states likely to pass laws requiring all embryos to be implanted. All of this will lead to litigation and the Court will have to decide whether there are constitutional limits on the states or whether the matter is really left entirely to the political process.
Read more: Access to abortion after the end of Roe
At the same time, medically induced abortions are now possible and account for almost half of all abortions. This will make it harder for states to ban abortions, as the pills can be sent across state lines. States that ban abortion will make it a crime to use these pills, although enforcement will be difficult. Additionally, there will be much more organized efforts to raise funds to help women in states where abortion is illegal gain access to the procedure.
Abortion will eventually dominate our political process like never before. State judicial elections — and 39 states have some form of judicial election — will focus on abortion because state judges can protect rights under state constitutions. Elections for state legislatures and city councils and for members of Congress will often focus more than ever on abortion rights.
With a Democratic President and a Democratic Congress, there will be renewed efforts to pass a federal law protecting a national right to abortion. But Democrats seem unlikely to overcome some Republican filibuster in the Senate. And the next time there’s a Republican President and a Republican Congress, they’ll surely try to pass legislation banning all abortions in the United States, with Republicans perhaps more likely to succeed in changing the rules of abortion. filibuster to pass such a law. .
One day, when there is a liberal Supreme Court, it will probably reverse the decision Dobbs and re-recognize a constitutional right to abortion. But in the years and perhaps decades until that happens, abortion will be the defining political issue for the United States.
It is unclear what this will mean for our political system. Will abortion advocates mobilize in a way that makes a political difference? And if so, where and what difference will it make? For decades, mostly out of a desire to override deer, Republicans in the election have focused on judicial appointments. Now, will the Democrats do this?
The central question in the abortion debate is who should decide. Roe vs. Wade held that it is up to each woman to decide for herself whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization says it’s for legislatures and the political process. The only thing that is certain is that the implications – for women’s lives and for our society – will be enormous and long-lasting.
More Must-Have Stories from TIME